|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
May 29th, 2007, 14:54 | #1 |
CQBR
Need a better AN/ PEQ and probably a KAC QD silencer. Probably a tac light wouldnt hurt. Other than that i dont think i can do to much more with it. Heres real steel for comparison. |
|
May 29th, 2007, 14:56 | #2 |
Beautiful piece.
__________________
Grenadier Weapons SRC Colt M4A1 FMU + CA Military M203 Long | TM G3 SAS | TM G3A3 | KJW Beretta M9 FMU _______________________________ Ottawa Valley Airsoft |
|
May 29th, 2007, 15:07 | #3 |
The Mk18 Mod0 and the CQBR are not exactly the same gun, but it's not like it really matters. For an Mk18, there is not much to add indeed, appart from the trades on the body Nice build
__________________
http://www.pbase.com/nervikaire Potius mori quam foedari http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/ |
|
May 29th, 2007, 15:13 | #4 |
well im either going to remove the trades or krylon it. Kind of split down the middle.
|
|
May 29th, 2007, 15:30 | #5 |
: ( i wish i could change the title now. i got pwn3d
|
|
May 29th, 2007, 15:31 | #6 |
Wrong, LMT uppers for the Mk.18 come in 10,5" while Colt uppers that are ALSO used in Mk18's are 10,3". Colt uppers are actually used more often then LMT as for the lower it can be M4A1 too. For the stock, more recent versions hae the LMT SOPMOD while older versions have the in-house Crane. Mk.18's are also seen with Colt regular and ''LE'' stocks.
__________________
http://www.pbase.com/nervikaire Potius mori quam foedari http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/ |
|
May 29th, 2007, 15:48 | #7 |
kos
|
I don't think m16 a1 lowers are used , man. First off, they have sharper edges around the front body pins, whereas the one in the picture does not. And if it's an M16 lower, wouldn't the trigger group be different aswell?
Anyways.. nice gun KG3, pretty damn bad-ass. I'm still stuck at the drawing boards... but I'll show ya mine when it's done ^_^ WHERE'S THE TROY FRONT?!?!?!? D: |
May 29th, 2007, 16:24 | #8 |
Okay okay, its apparent that while my AEG is nice, its not quite a CQBR (or mk 18) Aside from removing the trades, what do i need. Help for i am a young padawan. Im so used to HK weapons where its pretty straight forward, not ARs or AKs where the options are limitless. I feel bad, i wish i had researched this a bit more.
Also i doubt they use M16 A1 lowers. I think you mean they use the same trigger group. Also i posted this on MP.net and i got this post right after. I believe its the definition of pwn3d. weird trades though, but i know ive seen that lower before |
|
May 29th, 2007, 16:46 | #9 | |
They don't use A1 lower receiver, its all A3 receivers. If someone else wants to be build 100% exact copy then my god i'll give you a golden cup award, but since not everything can be done in airsoft example, trademarks, the difference of .2 inches in barrel length etc... You couldn't tell them from far apart or side by side.
Give Amazing KG3 a break, at least he is willing to spend his time and money to build something what he wants similiar to Mk18. Quoted from Wiki Quote:
|
||
May 29th, 2007, 16:46 | #10 |
Depends, want to build a CQBR or a Mk18? For a CQBR, I would say get a CQD sling end plate (G&P makes one w/o trades for cheap), replace the A2 grip with an A1, 10,3'' barrel. For an Mk18, the regular end plate is possible, as well as the 10,5 incher but you would need to get an LMT marked rear sight. Older CQBR's had the Crane version rear sight w/o trades or am I mixing with the Mk.18? Anyways, all that to say that your gun is fine like it is, unless you REALLY want to make a SEAL or VBSS impression.
__________________
http://www.pbase.com/nervikaire Potius mori quam foedari http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/ |
|
May 29th, 2007, 16:53 | #11 |
Im talking to some people who have used both in the US Navy. I think i want to build a CQBR. Pointers boys. Also theres nothing wrong with laying into me, all of you have corrected my mistakes still like my gun, and that makes me happy.
|
|
May 29th, 2007, 16:56 | #12 |
Its all about your liking not us man. If you don't like your gun then i'm sad lol Everyone has their own ways of loving their guns, glad you like yours :P
|
|
May 29th, 2007, 16:58 | #13 |
Oh i love it, and im not trying to make anything out of it, i just want some advice from of you guys. Just trying to pick your brains.
|
|
May 29th, 2007, 17:11 | #14 |
GBB Whisperer
|
WGC Custom Guns:
CQBR: mk18 mod0: As far as I can tell, the only real difference are the receivers... Also, several years ago, I did a CQBR replica. At the time, no airsoft Crane stocks were available, so most of my replicas weren't too accurate. However, at the time, there were some CQBR samples that used the standard M4 stock. Back then, the designation referred more to the upper, handguard/barrel setup and not so much the lower/rear of the gun. It was simply referred to as the "CQB-R upper". I don't even remember who I spoke to, but I contacted via email some guys who had access to and/or seen the real thing and said the lowers varied at the time, anywhere from Knight's to Colt lowers and the stocks were generally anything the operator preferred. I also recall coming across a national catalogue database that listed no actual "CQB-R" rifle - only a "CQB-R Upper" which could be attached to any lower/rear that the SEAL operator preferred. Anyways, check out the gallery as I have different setups shown with pictures of actual operators with the first generation NSW DEVGRU CQB-R: http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsoft/devgru
__________________
Advanced Airsoft Armaments and Enhancements Quick to the gun, sure of your grip. Quick to the threat, sure of your shot. Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas Accuracy, Power, Speed Last edited by ILLusion; May 29th, 2007 at 17:31.. |
May 29th, 2007, 17:28 | #15 | |
Quote:
So other than trades i can see that the sling mount is different, and the barrel is slightly shorter as well as the flash hider. So from now on ill just call it a CQBR. Can a mod change the title? |
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|