August 13th, 2008, 17:17 | #61 |
*COUGH* Use 7.4v 1000mah LiPo batteries...
|
|
August 13th, 2008, 17:20 | #62 |
Scotty aka harleyb
|
Uh... Why? Even without modifications, you can still fit an 8.4V 1100mAh NiMH battery.
__________________
|
August 13th, 2008, 17:22 | #63 | |
Quote:
EDIT: Higher discharge rate, far superior to 9.6v minis, with similar/better ROF and power. Smaller than a 8.4v mini. |
||
August 13th, 2008, 17:37 | #64 |
Scotty aka harleyb
|
Last I checked, high discharge Lipos were still pretty damn expensive, not to mention the need to get an entirely different charging setup. Even a 30C pack won't be able to push as much current as a good 2/3A NiMH cell. You can get an 8.4V 1500mAh mini pack for $23... what about a 30C Lipo?
__________________
|
August 13th, 2008, 17:43 | #65 | |
Quote:
16.60 + shipping. Lipo's have a lot of myths behind them. You don't need 30C to push m120's, 11.1v 20C can push a M120 (400FPS, m4 length barrel) at 20-25 bbs per second and it's smaller than an 8.4v mini NIMH pack. EDIT: I would like to state, for the record, that my battery knowledge comes from theory discussed on many airsoft/rcCar/rcPlane websites. I have no experience with LiPo batteries yet. I have ordered 2 11.1v 1600 mah lipo's from hobbycity, and they are waiting for me at my apartment for when I arrive on the 28th. I can give much better details then.
__________________
Ár skal r?*sa, sá er annars vill fé eða fjör hafa. Sjaldan liggjandi úlfur lær um getur né sofandi maður sigur. Last edited by ShelledPants; August 13th, 2008 at 17:47.. |
||
August 13th, 2008, 17:53 | #66 | |
Scotty aka harleyb
|
Quote:
What can I say, you may still convince me that Lipos are the way to go =P
__________________
|
|
August 13th, 2008, 17:56 | #67 | |
Quote:
I really can't wait to get back to Toronto to test them out. Judging from the videos I've seen though... They are absolutely awesome. Google "KWA Lipo" and you'll see a stream of video's of 13 year olds playing with 30 bb per second guns. The trigger response looks insane. |
||
August 13th, 2008, 18:39 | #68 |
personally i would rather have the normal P90's
__________________
|
|
August 13th, 2008, 21:24 | #69 |
Personally I don't see how the P90 could get uglier.
|
|
August 13th, 2008, 22:13 | #70 |
I'll agree that it does have an aquired taste that can either way for most, but I like them.
|
|
August 13th, 2008, 22:38 | #71 |
Le Roi des poissons d'avril
|
Respect the P90, it own in CQB.
But I like them in original form with as little bells and wisles on it as possible.
__________________
Vérificateur d'âge: Terrebonne |
August 13th, 2008, 23:47 | #72 |
I wouldn't know really, I've played one CQB game ever. I hate it compared to outdoors.
|
|
August 14th, 2008, 00:41 | #73 |
yeah i wouldnt want a P90 with all exterior add on's i like the normal stock p90's i wouldnt tinker with the exterior only the internals,, p90's look cool dont make it look ugly and even bigger !! the p90 basically is for CQB so dont make it bigger!!
__________________
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|