Quote:
Originally Posted by kullwarrior
seriously though, I would say this would be favorable for home defense... 1100fps on .2g does not give much energy <5J ...
|
**I'd recheck your calculations if I were you.
And definitly not liking the idea of these....
May years ago, I was present for a "controlled experiment" where in the buck shot was removed from a 12 guage shell and replaced with .20 weight BBs.
The shot gun was then discharged at a piece of plywood and chronied. The shot resulted on a molten mass of splattered plastic hitting the plywood will practically no penetration..... the chrony read ~700 fps.
Now obviously the BBs fired from these "shot gun shells" will not be molten, however, the underlying note here is the fps. These will more than likely be treated as real ammo (reguardless of what they are fired out of, it will be considered a fire arm because it's over 5.7J and over the 500 fps limit), and therefore will be controlled as such.
Shot gun.... non restricted, no biggie, every hunter has had or still has a shotty. But odds are that the Canadian Fire Arms Center will probably out right restrict use of these "shot gun shells" to military use only (for trainning).
Just my opinion.
SHA DO