Also note this:
Quote:
|
My expectation and hopes going into this review were to find that the new heavy .40 and .43 were the superior bb, but the numbers don't seem to say so. Aside from that, the feeding issue is a bit of a nuisance. Perhaps, if I improve the efficiency of the magazine feeding, I might be able to use the .40 and .43 properly. Since I had difficulty loading them, I wonder if the speed-loader had cause some sort of damage to them to cause these results. I can't discount the possibility that there may be something wrong with the data or the gun that caused those bb's to score so low, but I'm a believer of what I see and practicality.
|
I've been wanting to do a re-run of the heavies, but haven't had the time to do so. Of course, I will report back if I do.
John told me that other testers seem to be impressed with the .43's. It's possible that maybe I got a bad batch or I had somehow damaged them during the loading.